Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Nurs Adm Q ; 45(3): 234-242, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1249347

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic hit southeast Michigan hard and a rapid influx of patients forced Beaumont Health to shift rapidly into an emergency management model with a laser focus on transforming clinical care and administrative processes to meet complex patient care needs. Navigating this landscape required agility, surge planning, strong interprofessional teams, transformational leadership, nurse-led innovations, support, and transparency to manage the ever-changing environment. This article explains nursing's response and nurse-led innovations that were implemented to meet the needs of the community, patients, and staff, as well as lessons learned to ensure preparedness for any potential future surge.


Subject(s)
Creativity , Nursing Care/trends , Pandemics/prevention & control , Advanced Practice Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Nurse Administrators/trends , Nursing Care/methods , Nursing Care/standards , Personnel Management/methods , Personnel Management/statistics & numerical data
2.
J Appl Psychol ; 106(3): 317-329, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1192098

ABSTRACT

The current study aims to understand the detrimental effects of COVID-19 pandemic on employee job insecurity and its downstream outcomes, as well as how organizations could help alleviate such harmful effects. Drawing on event system theory and literature on job insecurity, we conceptualize COVID-19 as an event relevant to employees' work, and propose that event strength (i.e., novelty, disruption, and criticality) of COVID-19 influences employee job insecurity, which in turn affects employee work and non-work outcomes. We also identified important organization adaptive practices responding to COVID-19 based on a preliminary interview study, and examined its role in mitigating the undesired effects of COVID-19 event strength. Results from a two-wave lagged survey study indicated that employees' perceived COVID-19 event novelty and disruption (but not criticality) were positively related to their job insecurity, which in turn was positively related to their emotional exhaustion, organizational deviance, and saving behavior. Moreover, organization adaptive practices mitigated the effects of COVID-19 event novelty and criticality (but not disruption) on job insecurity. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Employment/psychology , Job Satisfaction , Occupational Health , Personnel Management/methods , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , China , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychological Theory , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(3): e212382, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1141275

ABSTRACT

Importance: The 2017-2018 influenza season in the US was marked by a high severity of illness, wide geographic spread, and prolonged duration compared with recent previous seasons, resulting in increased strain throughout acute care hospital systems. Objective: To characterize self-reported experiences and views of hospital capacity managers regarding the 2017-2018 influenza season in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this qualitative study, semistructured telephone interviews were conducted between April 2018 and January 2019 with a random sample of capacity management administrators responsible for throughput and hospital capacity at short-term, acute care hospitals throughout the US. Main Outcomes and Measures: Each participant's self-reported experiences and views regarding high patient volumes during the 2017-2018 influenza season, lessons learned, and the extent of hospitals' preparedness planning for future pandemic events. Interviews were recorded and transcribed and then analyzed using thematic content analysis. Outcomes included themes and subthemes. Results: A total of 53 key hospital capacity personnel at 53 hospitals throughout the US were interviewed; 39 (73.6%) were women, 48 (90.6%) had a nursing background, and 29 (54.7%) had been in the occupational role for more than 4 years. Participants' experiences were categorized into several domains: (1) perception of strain, (2) effects of influenza and influenza-like illness on staff and patient care, (3) immediate staffing and capacity responses to influenza and influenza-like illness, and (4) future staffing and capacity preparedness for influenza and influenza-like illness. Participants reported experiencing perceived strain associated with concerns about preparedness for seasonal influenza and influenza-like illness as well as concerns about staffing, patient care, and capacity, but future pandemic planning within hospitals was not reported as being a high priority. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this qualitative study suggest that during the 2017-2018 influenza season, there were systemic vulnerabilities as well as a lack of hospital preparedness planning for future pandemics at US hospitals. These issues should be addressed given the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Capacity Building , Change Management , Civil Defense/organization & administration , Disaster Planning/methods , Disease Outbreaks , Influenza, Human , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Capacity Building/methods , Capacity Building/organization & administration , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/therapy , Personnel Management/methods , Qualitative Research , SARS-CoV-2 , Seasons , Severity of Illness Index , United States/epidemiology
4.
Postgrad Med J ; 96(1141): 711-717, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-901414

ABSTRACT

Facing an investigation into performance concerns can be one of the most traumatic events in a doctor's career, and badly handled investigations can lead to severe distress. Yet there is no systematic way for National Health Service (NHS) Trusts to record the frequency of investigations, and extremely little data on the long-term outcomes of such action for the doctors. The document-Maintaining High Professional Standards in the Modern NHS (a framework for the initial investigation of concerns about doctors and dentists in the NHS)-should protect doctors from facing unfair or mismanaged performance management procedures, which include conduct, capability and health. Equally, it provides NHS Trusts with a framework that must be adhered to when managing performance concerns regarding doctors. Yet, very few doctors have even heard of it or know about the provisions it contains for their protection, and the implementation of the framework appears to be very variable across NHS Trusts. By empowering all doctors with the knowledge of what performance management procedures exist and how best practice should be implemented, we aim to ensure that they are informed participants in any investigation should it occur.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Physicians , Professional Practice , Professionalism , Work Performance/standards , Humans , Liability, Legal , Medical Errors/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Personnel Management/methods , Physicians/psychology , Physicians/standards , Professional Practice/organization & administration , Professional Practice/standards , Professionalism/ethics , Professionalism/legislation & jurisprudence , Professionalism/standards , State Medicine/standards , United Kingdom , Workforce/organization & administration
5.
Lab Med ; 52(1): e8-e14, 2021 Jan 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-857658

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A positive result of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection provides critical laboratory evidence for clinical confirmed diagnosis, pandemic status evaluation, a pandemic prevention plan, treatment of infected people with symptoms, and protection of uninfected people. This study aims to provide a practical reference for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid-related research and detection. METHODS: Our laboratory has established policies combining personnel management and quality control practices for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection during the pandemic. RESULTS: In this article, we describe cross-department personnel management and key points of personal protection and quality control in the testing process. We also report on the differences in detection and the compatibility between different brand kits. CONCLUSION: It is critical to maintain a standard and accurate laboratory operation for nucleic acid testing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/standards , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , RNA, Viral/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/virology , Humans , Observer Variation , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Personnel Management/methods , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Quality Control , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
6.
Urology ; 146: 1-3, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-844443

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the perception and value of virtual open houses for urology applicants in the COVID-19 era, since students can no longer attend subinternships and all interviews will be conducted virtually. METHODS: A Twitter survey was sent to 230 likely urology applicants connected through the UroResidency platform. It asked about the relative value of components of the virtual open house and areas for suggested improvement. RESULTS: Seventy responded. Most potential applicants valued virtual open houses that discussed strengths and weaknesses of the program, had time to interact directly with the faculty, and included resident led presentations or discussions. Most agreed programs needed to have more direct time with residents to better understand the culture of the program. CONCLUSION: In this first virtual interview season for urology, likely applicants generally engage in virtual open houses and strongly prefer time to interact directly with residents to assess the program culture.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency/standards , Urology/education , Career Choice , Education, Distance , Humans , Job Application , Personnel Management/methods , Program Evaluation , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Urology/standards , Virtual Reality
7.
Acad Med ; 95(10): 1495-1498, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-71778

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has stretched health care resources to a point of crisis throughout the world. To answer the call for care, health care workers in a diverse range of specialties are being retasked to care for patients with COVID-19. Consequently, specialty services have had to adapt to decreased staff available for coverage coupled with a need to remain available for specialty-specific emergencies, which now require a dynamic definition. In this Invited Commentary, the authors describe their experiences and share lessons learned regarding triage of patients, staff safety, workforce management, and the psychological impact as they have adapted to a new reality in the Department of Neurosurgery at Montefiore Medical Center, a COVID-19 hot spot in New York City.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Medicine/organization & administration , Pandemics , Personnel Management/methods , Pneumonia, Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humans , New York City/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL